During these municipal elections has spoken exclusively of names. She refused the proposal of Left Ecology wise Liberty, who from the first meeting between the secretaries of the parties pointed to a location quickly and clearly identify a candidate for unit. It was culpably lost time, and this resulted in a prolonged discussion on the absurd name of the candidate to the detriment of more important points which are relevant to the topic complex and difficult administration of the municipality over the next five years. Left Ecology Freedom was the only party that has felt strong, the duty to submit to the coalition and its programmatic proposal for citizenship.
For some time we delivered the program, tonight presented to the citizens, to the other parties of the center-left. Pity, really, that this occurred in a climate where everyone was focused on names and tactics, and rightly so little interest to a nationality involved mainly with concrete proposals on how to tackle the serious problems of our country.
The economic crisis has resulted in a huge sconquassi Altotiberini economy has always been based on a type of manufacturing that is now in direct competition with emerging countries. The cuts in funding to local authorities determine, in 2011, the need for our common save five million euro.
Given all this, Left Ecology Freedom deliberately chose not to present the usual rhetoric and unworkable "book of dreams." But he has chosen to present program points that are inspired by pragmatism more responsible: the points that we present are viable, why does not "cost" and even determine in many cases substantial savings.
Two were the principles that inspired us in drafting the program. The first is precisely the viability of pragmatism, of savings. The other is that which deals with the recovery of the administrative role of the public institution in the address. SEL believes that not everything is "marketization" that should make a clear demarcation between the scope of the market, the public institution: the failed liberal ideology, which preaches the extent of the market in every area of \u200b\u200blife, can not belong .
It is in homage to these two guiding principles that we said the battle, sacrosanct, for public water is not sufficient to restore the institution that leadership, guidance, we believe that today more than ever essential. What is necessary to redefine and reaffirm a broader concept of "common good", like something that must be subtracted to the logic of mere private profit.
So then our concrete proposals have been addressed, for example as regards the management of environmental, along the lines of Capannori, where our fellow Alessio Ciacci, Deputy Mayor, is doing a work of excellence. Today, the only way to combine savings and environmental protection is the reduction of upstream waste followed by a rigorous collection, not one that sees the private appetites converge towards the complementary solution based on landfills and incinerators.
Similarly, with regard to health must be avoided is too much waste is a frivolous use of forms of outsourcing in favor of private companies. The "report was" on avoidable hospitalization is clear: in Città di Castello, we have the worst data on unnecessary hospital admissions, and a waste that reverberates with harmful effects on a priority that it should receive more support statement, namely that of reduction of waiting lists.
look for another example, the issue of land use plan. What we have called "participatory planning" returned to the institution that public role as guarantor of the general approach towards an urban planning that can not be delegated to individuals.
A Town of Castle was rather too often an urbanism that followed as the "Agreement", which is at the mercy of a private-trading that has also embraced the scope of the strategy, which is the remit of the public institution .
This has led to the construction market dominated by a few companies, which have imposed a pricing policy is completely unacceptable.
It is therefore necessary that the public institution to recover from the role of "referee" in the public-private relationship. That democratize and make transparent its internal mechanisms.
And that transparency is an important point of our program. Because it is only with transparency that the public institution may recover the trust of the citizen who is now seriously compromised.
But transparency's sake, as a sort trivial curiosity, but a transparency aimed at the elimination of waste. Why, when you ask people to sacrifice, politics can not expect to continue to sit in a kind of golden niche.
0 comments:
Post a Comment